|
Post by Śp̨͡ê` (҉) on Aug 25, 2011 4:06:18 GMT -5
Yes, well it's okay if one member is not posting in a thread or two... But the more activity the better, for sure.
|
|
Project-Diddy
Map Maker
M E O
They'd never find us again once the trail's gone cold...
Posts: 112
|
Post by Project-Diddy on Aug 25, 2011 14:15:46 GMT -5
Well, indeed. Although, it'll end eventually, which means someone actually could win.
Theoretically, if one of us posted something so very awkward, that no one can bring themselves to reply to it, such a person would win this. So there -are- actually tactics. >:3
|
|
|
Post by Suicide on Aug 25, 2011 15:32:12 GMT -5
..
|
|
|
Post by Śp̨͡ê` (҉) on Aug 26, 2011 2:20:22 GMT -5
Hmm, awkward, huh?
...
I'm not very good at these kinds of things. LOL.
|
|
|
Post by Suicide on Aug 26, 2011 3:00:10 GMT -5
Actually, from my experience throughout the past years in convos, the ".." is a heck of a discussion/conversation killer.
So...
..
|
|
|
Post by Śp̨͡ê` (҉) on Aug 26, 2011 18:04:29 GMT -5
Ehh, it doesn't stop me much.
|
|
Project-Diddy
Map Maker
M E O
They'd never find us again once the trail's gone cold...
Posts: 112
|
Post by Project-Diddy on Aug 27, 2011 7:08:59 GMT -5
Me neither.
Except the majority of conversations which become awkward, in my experience, probably should never be repeated or even thought of again.
|
|
|
Post by Suicide on Aug 27, 2011 8:57:28 GMT -5
It's unfair - and how am I supposed to be a winner?
|
|
Project-Diddy
Map Maker
M E O
They'd never find us again once the trail's gone cold...
Posts: 112
|
Post by Project-Diddy on Aug 27, 2011 11:18:31 GMT -5
Why would we want you to be a winner? >:3
Still, I need to think of a few awkward things to say. You may well feel the full glory of my lack of social awareness! :3
|
|
|
Post by Śp̨͡ê` (҉) on Aug 27, 2011 22:35:33 GMT -5
Oh, my, I can tell this is gonna get ugly!
|
|
|
Post by Suicide on Aug 28, 2011 16:39:19 GMT -5
הגב לנושא זה, החבר 'ה ...
|
|
Project-Diddy
Map Maker
M E O
They'd never find us again once the trail's gone cold...
Posts: 112
|
Post by Project-Diddy on Aug 28, 2011 16:42:11 GMT -5
Either it will get ugly, or absolutely beautifully brilliant. :3
And I can't reply to that in Hebrew, Fadi, but I'm replying to it in English. Which still counts. >:3
|
|
|
Post by Suicide on Aug 28, 2011 16:49:42 GMT -5
You really didn't reply, because your post and mine don't correlate or will sound senseless if they are after one another, just like they are right now.
ג'יימס, אתה לא ענה לי!
|
|
Project-Diddy
Map Maker
M E O
They'd never find us again once the trail's gone cold...
Posts: 112
|
Post by Project-Diddy on Aug 29, 2011 7:49:44 GMT -5
I disagree - I certainly did answer and reply to you, and am doing so now also. Certainly, from an outside perspective, the conversation that we are having appears disjointed and disjunct. However, it is evident that we are having a conversation, and a pre-requisite for conversation to occur is that the two individuals direct their comments' content towards answering the content of the comment previously made - i.e. that the individuals reply to one another.
More over, the word "reply" in itself contains no requirement that an outside individual who is not involved in the conversation may understand what it being said, only that the content of one message is designed to follow a previous comment and add to it in some way, in the eyes of those involved in the conversation. Since, evidently, your comment was directly towards me and was relevant to the content of my previous message, you understood my comment and its relevance to your comment prior to mine, and hence tacitly accept that my comment was a reply to yours. Otherwise it wouldn't have made any sense to you and you wouldn't have known that I was talking to you at all.
|
|
|
Post by Suicide on Aug 29, 2011 8:26:27 GMT -5
A: "How are you?" B: "Who are you?" A: "I'm fine thanks, and yourself?" B: "Yeah I know"
This is not a "conversation" - the replies don't correlate. That's what just happened above. Not because you reply to me, means that I really replied to you.
|
|
|
Post by F.L. on Aug 30, 2011 7:45:05 GMT -5
Lol well I agree that giving an answer such as "Yeah I know!" isn't quite having a discussion... But anyway I've post, so anyone has something to say?
|
|
|
Post by Suicide on Aug 30, 2011 13:03:47 GMT -5
I do! I've got to say, that I'm the winner
|
|
|
Post by Śp̨͡ê` (҉) on Aug 30, 2011 23:30:15 GMT -5
Haha, not anymore.
|
|
|
Post by Suicide on Aug 31, 2011 5:09:37 GMT -5
Now not? :-)
|
|
|
Post by F.L. on Aug 31, 2011 9:48:19 GMT -5
Well because you asked a question and it ultimatly needs an answer! Which means you couldn't win by the post just above mine... In other words, I win, but for the momment because eventually someone's going to post something up, especially Suicide to whichever agree or disagree to what I said and explain what he was thinking when he posted his question "Now not?", so technicly if I say no to him, because it would have been obvious to give such an answer, I'm trying my best to figure out what you're gonna say. If I ever find out however, you guys will probably answer up by "yeah that what I was thinking about" and I would ultimatly be the loser! XD So the only way to win here is simply by whichever locking it or waiting until people stop posting in it, which means there's always a possibility that someone necromatic the thread to have a second chance... So no you don't need to say anything I know I'm somewhat spoiling you out some informations that you wouldn't directly think of, and yeah I know the real meaning of the thread: having some fun! And I'm having too, just trying my best to win XD! I can't even say goodbye because once I say so, anyone can answer it, so yeah I'm gonna say goodbye and I'm already predicting the answer which would be "goodbye FL", just to have the final post , so no needs to say goodbye, because it's non-sense saying something that you're not thinking of, because I wouldn't go far away and anyway it wouldn't change much if I'm staying active as a normal rate! And yes I've said it's a normal rate because a normal rate it's when it's up to the rate that it's just fine, not too much because it would have been ridiculous and non-sense, which wouldn't be normal!
|
|